Directory > Providers > Doctor > Internist > KS > Topeka > Eric Voth, MD > Reviews

Eric Voth, MD

Nearby

Internists

Cotton-O'Neil Clinic

Topeka, KS

Cotton-O'Neil Clinic

Topeka, KS

Cotton-O'Neil Clinic

Topeka, KS

Cotton-O'Neil Clinic

Topeka, KS
Get Featured on Wellness.com > Learn More
Eric Voth, MD
Cotton-O'Neil Clinic
(6 Reviews)
> Get Phone Number & Directions
901 SW Garfield Ave Topeka, KS 66606
Add a Review

Consumer Feedback

(6 Reviews)
Service
3.5 star average for Service
Environment
4 star average for Environment
Expertise
3.5 star average for Expertise
Recommended
3.5 star average for Recommended
Value
5 star average for Value
THIS MAN IS A FOOL TO THE NTH DEGREE. PUTS HIMSELF OUT THERE AS A EXPERT AND ALL HE IS, IS A PUPPET TO THE DRUG COMPANIES, PUSHES PHAMACEUTICALS AND IGNORES CENTURIES OF THE POSITIVE USES OF CANNIBUS. MAYBE HE NEEDS TO COME TO THE UNDERSTANDING THAT PUSHINGS OLD ADGENDAS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SIMPLE FACTS. OUR PRESIDENTS WAS A POT HEAD, YET, HE COMPLETED COLLEGE, A MASTERS, AND ROSE TO PRESIDENT. NOTHING PREVENTED HIM FROM DOING THIS, INCLUDING HIS MASIVE USE OF CANNIBUS. STOP TAKING THE PHAMACEUTICAL COMPANIES MONIES AND START BEING A REAL DOCTOR
by FREDERICK COMINGS xxx.xxx.240.35
May 04, 2015
Dr. Voth didn't seem too happy to be helping me, but his staff is wonderful! I enjoy seeing Dawnette Streeter, his PA, much more than I enjoy seeing him.
by Wife xxx.xxx.11.134
July 22, 2013
Does this provider promptly return your phone calls?
Yes
Does this provider use current and safe equipment?
Yes; the equipment is very advanced!
Do you feel that you could have received better service somewhere else?
No, I don't think so
Did you feel like this provider's office was understaffed?
Not at all, they had plenty of staff members to help me whenever I needed assistance
Did this provider ever dismiss your concerns as unimportant?
No, they take every concern of mine seriously
by Anonymous xxx.xxx.195.189
July 09, 2013
Dr. Voth is heavily influenced by the Pharmecutical industry as well as anti-medical marijuana propaganda. His views about the subject are antiquated and incorrect. Dr. Voth was quoted saying that marijuana leads so psychosis and siczophrenia, even though the data from many of these studies had either been fabricated or highly embelished. I have never in my life, met someone who
smokes cannabis and is prone to psychotic episodes. In fact, the only reputable study done, occured in the 70's. The scientific inquiry was funded by the nixon administration in order to show that Marijuana causes neurological damage. However the study, found quite the opposite. Not only was no evidence found to support neurological dangers inherent to marijuana consumption, the study found that cannabis actually promotes health in the central nervous system. The so-called carcinogenic effects are also grossly exaggerated. This is because cannabis has the ability to enact what doctors and scientists call, apoptosis; or programmable cell-death. This means that when cancer cells form in the human body, and begin proliferating without hinderence from the brain's apoptosis function, cannabis can turn the mechanism back on and thus force cancer cells to commit sucicide. Also, there are well over a 100 proven beneficial medical uses for cannabis; including nasuea and chronic pain. How is that not medically beneficial? I watched a documentary with Dr.Voth as an interviewee, and he thinks that pharmecuticals are somehow safer than a completely natural substance that has NEVER been linked to a single fatality. Can pharmecutical medications say the same? I think not. It is ludicrious to suggest that a body that is born of the natural world, would be better treated with artificial substances, rather than natural ones. The more people tamper with a natural formula, the more dangerous that substance becomes. Very few people know why cannabis became illegal in the first place. There are three major reasons. The first came about because of theh great depression. The large mexican migrant work force had taken the jobs that white Americans would never even consider doing before the depression. After it hit, the Southern states were looking for ways to oust the mexican migrants and install white Americans in those newly vacated positions. Many Mexicans smoked cannabis, so it was only natural that many southern states illegalized it's use. They used the law to arrest and deport Mexican workers. Cannabis also was illegalized because of intense lobbying from people likek William Randolph Hearst who saw his timber interests plummeting because hemp was poised to overtake wood as a readily available inexpensive material to make paper. Along the same lines, new synthetic fibers such as nylon and polyester were being developed by dupont and others would never make a dime as long as hemp was legal. So, even though hemp and cannabis are not even close to the same thing, Harry J Anslinger used the lobbyiest donations(bribes) to enact the very first anti-marijuana laws. This law put the hemp industry on its rear-end and even after 20 years when hemp was made legal once again, the industry was never able to recover. The final reason for cannabis being outlawed
was because during prohibition, pple turned more and more to cannabis which was for the moment, still legal. When prohibition ended, the alcohol industry needed to make sure that pple drank booze instead of smoking cannabis. So, they too bribed the appropriate people and did their part keeping cannabis as a schedule one. So, if you're looking for an honest doctor, who isn't beholden to Big-pharma and who doesn't parrot meaningless or non-existent research in order to solidify his position as head of the national drug council, look elsewhere. Dr. Voth thinks that pharmecuticals aren't dangerous even though legal perscription drugs kill more pple every year than every single illegal drug combined. If the man was honest and possessed any measure of integrity, he wouldn't be so vehemently against medicinal marijuana. If he had a brain, he wouldn't be pushing dangerous pharmecuticals at the expense of his patients health. If he had a heart, he wouldn't deny his patients relief because of his outdated, dishonest opinions.











































































smokes m
by Eric Marks
January 23, 2012
They seemed stuck in the past. I was nervous about being exposed to archaic treatment methods. They barely gave me any information at all. I'm going to have to do my own research to get my questions answered. When I first opened the door to their office, I noticed a faint but distinctly foul odor. It wasn't unbearable, but it definitely wasn't enjoyable.
by Sally M
October 09, 2011
Was this provider's office easy to locate?
Fairly Easy
Does this provider have helpful information available online?
Yes, but very little
Did you feel safe in this provider's care?
Yes
Did you spend a lot of time in the waiting room at this provider's office?
No, my appointment started at the scheduled time
by Anonymous
April 10, 2011
Add a Review
Map and Directions
901 SW Garfield Ave, Topeka, KS 66606